Can DMT Repair the Brain?
What Two Landmark Trials Can Mean for Stroke, Depression — and the Future of Ayahuasca
Rini Hartman
5 March 2026
For most of its known history, N,N-dimethyltryptamine — DMT — has occupied a peculiar place in pharmacology. It is produced naturally in the human body, found in dozens of plant species, and has been consumed ceremonially in South America for centuries as a key component of the brew known as ayahuasca. Western clinical research began in the 1990s with Rick Strassman's pioneering human studies, and Brazilian groups have studied ayahuasca's effects for over two decades. But DMT remained at the margins of mainstream medicine — until 2025.
Two recent studies, published within six months of each other, have moved DMT from the margins of psychedelic research into the centre of clinical neuroscience. The first, published in Science Advances in August 2025, showed that DMT significantly reduces brain damage after stroke in animal models. The second, published in Nature Medicine in February 2026, reported the first placebo-controlled trial of intravenous DMT for major depressive disorder, with results comparable to psilocybin. Together, they suggest that a molecule best known for inducing intense visionary experiences may also protect and repair the brain through mechanisms that have nothing to do with hallucination.
Meanwhile, a separate and growing body of research — much of it from Brazilian universities since the early 2000s, with more recent contributions from groups in Spain, the Czech Republic, and the Netherlands — has been examining ayahuasca itself: not isolated DMT, but the full traditional brew, with all its pharmacological complexity. Brain imaging studies, trauma research, and large observational surveys are building a picture of a compound whose therapeutic potential may extend well beyond what any single alkaloid can deliver.
This article examines what we now know, what remains uncertain, and what these findings might mean for patients, for regulation, and for our understanding of a potential medicine that Western science is only now beginning to explain — one that Indigenous communities have been working with for centuries.
The Stroke Discovery
Ischaemic stroke — caused by a blood clot blocking an artery in the brain — affects roughly 12 million people worldwide each year. Current treatments focus on removing the clot, either with clot-dissolving drugs (thrombolysis) or mechanical retrieval (thrombectomy). But only about 20–25% of patients arrive within the treatment window, and real-world treatment rates are lower still — as few as 3–9% actually receive thrombolysis [1]. For the vast majority, there is no approved drug that can protect brain tissue from the cascade of inflammation and cell death that follows a stroke. This is one of the great unmet needs of neurology.
The study by Marcell László and colleagues at the HUN-REN Biological Research Centre and Semmelweis University in Budapest addressed this gap directly. Using a well-established rat model of stroke (transient middle cerebral artery occlusion), the team administered DMT and observed significantly smaller areas of brain damage compared to untreated animals [2]. The compound preserved the integrity of the blood-brain barrier, reduced cerebral swelling, and dampened inflammatory signals while increasing anti-inflammatory markers. Behavioural assessments indicated improved motor outcomes, though the primary endpoints were lesion volume and biomarkers rather than functional recovery.
The key finding was the mechanism. DMT's neuroprotective effects worked primarily through sigma-1 receptors — not the serotonin 5-HT₂A receptors responsible for the psychedelic experience. When the researchers blocked sigma-1 receptors using a selective antagonist, DMT's protective effects disappeared. This distinction matters enormously: it raises the possibility that the brain-protective benefits of DMT could potentially be delivered at doses below the threshold for hallucination — though this has not yet been tested — making it potentially viable for use in acute medical settings where patients may be unconscious or cognitively impaired.
Why previous drugs failed
The history of neuroprotective drug development for stroke is long and discouraging. Dozens of candidates have shown promise in animal models only to fail in human trials. One recent contender, nerinetide, was degraded during standard clot-busting treatment — meaning it could not work alongside existing therapies. An earlier sigma-1 agonist called cutamesine had insufficient binding affinity to produce clinically meaningful effects. DMT appears to overcome these limitations: it has potent sigma-1 activity, alongside additional neuroprotective pathways including anti-inflammatory effects. As an endogenous compound — DMT is naturally present in mammalian brain tissue — it may also have inherently better tolerability, though this remains speculative.
Toward human trials
A Phase 1 safety study, published in Clinical and Translational Science in May 2025, confirmed that prolonged intravenous DMT infusion (up to six hours) is safe in healthy volunteers [3]. No serious adverse events occurred, vital signs remained stable, and psychedelic effects were manageable. The study also characterised DMT's pharmacokinetics: the compound is rapidly metabolised by monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A), with a half-life of approximately 5–19 minutes, allowing clinicians to precisely control exposure levels via continuous infusion.
Building on this safety data, Algernon NeuroScience announced in February 2025 a Phase 2a trial in Hungary, designed to test sub-psychedelic DMT in 40 ischaemic stroke patients. The trial is randomised, double-blind, and led by Dr Sándor Nardai at Semmelweis University in Budapest, with enrolment planned from Q3 2025.† If it proceeds as designed, it will be the first time DMT is administered to stroke patients in a clinical setting.
The Depression Trial
The second breakthrough arrived from a different direction entirely. David Erritzoe and colleagues at Imperial College London conducted a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous DMT in 34 adults with moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder [4]. The results, published in Nature Medicine in February 2026, showed that a single 10-minute DMT infusion, combined with structured therapeutic support, produced significantly greater improvement than placebo at two weeks — with a large effect size (d = 0.82) comparable to psilocybin trials. Benefits persisted for at least three months. No serious adverse events occurred.
Three aspects of the trial stand out. First, the speed: measurable improvement within a week, compared to four to six weeks for conventional antidepressants. Second, the duration: a single session producing months of benefit, unlike daily medication. Third, the practicality: intravenous DMT has a plasma half-life of minutes — not hours — with subjective effects lasting 10–30 minutes after a single dose. Even with preparation and monitoring, the entire clinical session takes around two hours — a fraction of the six to eight hours required for psilocybin therapy. (By contrast, in ayahuasca the experience lasts far longer. The harmala alkaloids inhibit the enzyme that normally breaks DMT down, extending its activity well beyond the peak. DMT plasma levels peak at around 1.5–2 hours after ingestion, but the subjective visionary peak varies considerably depending on the brew's composition and individual factors — from minutes to over an hour — while the full experience, shaped by both the sustained DMT and the harmala alkaloids' own milder psychoactive contributions, commonly fades out over 4–6 hours. Many participants also report an "afterglow" — a period of heightened clarity, emotional openness, and wellbeing — that can persist for days or even weeks [10]. This article's clinical sections refer to isolated, intravenous DMT unless stated otherwise.)
Perhaps most intriguingly, the intensity of participants' mystical-type experiences appeared to moderate the antidepressant response. Participants who reported the deepest experiences — characterised by feelings of unity, sacredness, and transcendence of time — showed the greatest reductions in depression scores. This finding complicates the hope that DMT's therapeutic effects can be neatly separated from the subjective experience.
The researchers themselves noted that DMT was administered alongside preparation sessions, a supportive therapeutic environment, and integration follow-up — and they could not determine whether the drug alone would have achieved the same results. This echoes a broader finding across psychedelic research: context matters. The drug opens a door, but what happens in the room appears to shape the outcome.
It is worth noting that the Erritzoe trial is not the only evidence for DMT's antidepressant potential. An earlier open-label trial of vaporised DMT for treatment-resistant depression found that a single session produced rapid antidepressant effects, with 71% of participants responding by one week [5]. While open-label results carry less weight than placebo-controlled data, the consistency is encouraging.
One Molecule, Two Mechanisms
What makes these two studies remarkable together is that DMT appears to work through different pathways in each condition. In stroke, the critical mechanism is sigma-1 receptor activation — a cellular stress-response pathway that protects neurons, stabilises the blood-brain barrier, and reduces inflammation. In depression, the primary pathway involves serotonin 5-HT₂A receptors and the promotion of neural plasticity — the brain's capacity to form new connections and reorganise existing ones.
Recent research has identified at least three plasticity-promoting mechanisms. First, intracellular 5-HT₂A activation: a 2023 study in Science revealed that psychedelics activate serotonin receptors inside the cell, in ways that serotonin itself cannot, triggering growth signals that promote structural brain changes [6]. This finding is compelling but not uncontested: at least one 2024 study using primary cortical neurons with low receptor expression found no plasticity effects, suggesting the mechanism depends on adequate 5-HT₂A receptor levels in the target tissue. Second, direct TrkB receptor binding: certain psychedelics — notably LSD and psilocin — have been shown to bind to the same receptors activated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), the brain's natural growth promoter, with affinities up to 1,000-fold higher than conventional antidepressants [7]. Whether DMT shares this specific binding profile at comparable affinity is not yet established, though preclinical evidence suggests it engages similar plasticity pathways. Third, sigma-1 receptor agonism, which is central to DMT's neuroprotective effects. DMT engages multiple pathways — an unusual breadth of action for a single compound.
Two comprehensive reviews published in 2025 have confirmed these mechanisms. A review in Brain Sciences analysed 70 studies and concluded that preclinical evidence for psychedelic-induced plasticity is "soundly consistent" [8]. A separate review in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews documented effects at molecular, structural, and functional levels [9].
The Ayahuasca Evidence: What the Full Brew Does to the Brain
The clinical trials described above use isolated, pharmaceutical-grade DMT administered intravenously. But there is a parallel line of research examining ayahuasca itself — the traditional brew that contains DMT alongside harmala alkaloids contributed mostly by the Banisteriopsis caapi vine. This research is smaller in scale and less controlled, but it offers insights that isolated-DMT studies cannot, because it examines the compound as it has actually been used for centuries.
Structural brain changes
Small imaging studies have linked long-term ayahuasca use to increased cortical thickness in brain regions involved in attention and self-awareness [10]. Laboratory experiments have shown that ayahuasca's components — including the harmala alkaloids, not just DMT — stimulate the growth of new neurons in cell cultures [11]. A 2025 fMRI study found that machine learning could distinguish long-term ayahuasca users from non-users with 75% accuracy, based on brain activity patterns particularly in regions involved in emotion processing [12]. While these are observational findings that cannot prove causation, they suggest lasting changes in brain structure and function among regular users.
The default mode network
Brain imaging studies consistently show that ayahuasca modulates the default mode network (DMN) — reducing its activity during the acute experience and altering its connectivity patterns afterwards [13]. The DMN is associated with our sense of self, autobiographical memory, and habitual patterns of thinking. When it quiets down, those patterns loosen, and new possibilities emerge.
This is potentially significant for understanding depression and trauma, both of which involve being stuck in rigid, repetitive patterns of thought — rumination, self-criticism, re-experiencing traumatic memories. The temporary loosening of these patterns may be precisely what creates the opening for therapeutic change. EEG studies consistently show reduced alpha wave power and increased signal complexity during the ayahuasca experience [14], suggesting a brain state that is less constrained by its usual defaults.
Trauma and PTSD
Preclinical research has revealed that ayahuasca weakens the reconsolidation of traumatic fear memories in rats, with effects lasting over three weeks; specific serotonin receptors in the prefrontal cortex have been identified as critical mediators of this fear extinction [15]. A randomised, double-blind trial at the University of São Paulo is now comparing ayahuasca to esketamine for PTSD treatment [16] — one of the first controlled studies of ayahuasca specifically for trauma. Previous controlled data from Brazil lends support: a 2019 randomised, placebo-controlled trial at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte found that a single dose of ayahuasca produced rapid antidepressant effects in 29 patients with treatment-resistant depression, with a large effect size (d = 1.49 at day 7) [26].
Observational data from military veterans participating in ayahuasca retreats has shown meaningful symptom reductions — approximately 26% improvement on standardised PTSD measures [17]. These are not controlled trials, and they cannot rule out placebo effects or self-selection bias. But they provide encouraging signals that warrant more rigorous investigation.
Integration and context
A crucial finding from recent research concerns what happens after the ayahuasca experience. A 2025 analysis of over 10,000 ceremony attendees found that those with supportive settings and guidance reported significantly better long-term mental health outcomes, while those who felt isolated or unsafe had poorer outcomes [18]. Intriguingly, even challenging experiences — intense visions, difficult emotions — correlated with positive mental health later, provided they were processed in a supportive context.
This underscores a point that the clinical DMT trials also suggest: the quality of support around the experience matters. Whether we call it "psychotherapeutic support" (as the Erritzoe trial does) or "integration" (as the ayahuasca community does), the principle is the same. The compound may open a window of enhanced neural flexibility, but what happens during that window shapes the outcome.
DMT research vs. ayahuasca research: an important distinction
It is important to be clear about what these different lines of research can and cannot tell us. The stroke and depression trials use isolated DMT, administered intravenously, in controlled medical settings. They tell us about DMT specifically. The ayahuasca studies examine the full brew — with all its pharmacological complexity — in ceremonial or therapeutic contexts. They tell us about ayahuasca.
The overlap is real, but more limited than often assumed. In brews that combine Banisteriopsis caapi with DMT-containing admixture plants, DMT is the principal visionary compound. But in several Indigenous traditions, ayahuasca refers to the vine alone — caapi without any DMT-containing plant — and these vine-only preparations, which are legal in most jurisdictions, are considered medicines in their own right. The contexts, dosing, route of administration, and pharmacology between clinical DMT and any form of ayahuasca are distinct. Ayahuasca contains MAO inhibitors that alter DMT's metabolism, extend its duration, and contribute their own therapeutic effects. Clinical IV DMT delivers a precise dose over minutes.
There are also dimensions of the ayahuasca experience that no clinical DMT trial captures — in particular, the role of the group setting. In traditional and contemporary ceremonial use, ayahuasca is almost always taken in community, with shared intention, music, and guidance. The contribution of this communal container to therapeutic outcomes has barely been studied, but is widely reported by participants and practitioners.
Anyone drawing conclusions from one line of research to the other should do so with care.
Beyond DMT: Ayahuasca's Other Alkaloids
DMT is only one of several pharmacologically active compounds in ayahuasca. The brew also contains harmala alkaloids — harmine, harmaline, and tetrahydroharmine (THH) — from the Banisteriopsis caapi vine. These compounds serve as monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, which is what allows orally ingested DMT to survive digestion and reach the brain. But they are not merely enablers.
Harmine has demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties in its own right. Notably, it inhibits DYRK1A, a kinase implicated in both neurodegenerative disease and Down syndrome. DYRK1A overexpression leads to pathological hyperphosphorylation of the protein tau — one of the hallmark processes driving neuronal death in Alzheimer's disease — and harmine has been shown to suppress this at the molecular level, though this has not yet been validated in authentic Alzheimer's disease models [24]. The finding has nonetheless attracted interest far beyond the psychedelic field: medicinal chemists have begun hybridising harmine's DYRK1A-inhibiting structure with isoDMT molecules to create novel non-hallucinogenic 'psychoplastogens' — compounds that may promote neural growth while suppressing neurodegeneration [25]. Harmine has also been shown to promote neurogenesis and protect against memory impairment in animal models by upregulating BDNF levels [11]. Tetrahydroharmine acts as a weak serotonin reuptake inhibitor — a mechanism it shares with conventional antidepressants. Harmaline is a potent MAO-A inhibitor with distinct neurological effects currently under investigation.
Research into these alkaloids individually is still in early stages. But the implication is significant: the clinical trials currently focusing on isolated DMT are studying only one piece of what ayahuasca delivers. The therapeutic potential of the full brew — with its complex pharmacological interplay of multiple alkaloids — may yet prove broader than any single compound. This is an area where Indigenous knowledge, accumulated over centuries of use, may be well ahead of Western pharmacology.
The Plasticity Window: Why What Happens After Matters
One of the most important findings from recent neuroplasticity research is that the enhanced brain flexibility induced by psychedelics does not end when the experience does. Evidence suggests that this window of heightened plasticity remains open for days or even weeks afterwards — a period when the brain is unusually receptive to forming new patterns and consolidating new insights.
A 2025 study published in Cell demonstrated that psilocybin-induced plasticity is activity-dependent: the neural changes that persist depend on what the individual is actually doing and thinking during the heightened plasticity window [19]. While this study used psilocybin rather than DMT, the underlying mechanism — TrkB-mediated synaptic growth — is shared across psychedelic compounds.
This has practical implications for anyone considering these treatments, whether in a clinical setting or a ceremonial context. The period following the experience — what clinicians call "the integration phase" — is when new neural patterns are being consolidated. Active engagement with the insights gained (through therapy, journalling, meditation, or behavioural change) may help cement beneficial patterns. Conversely, returning immediately to old environments and habits may cause the brain to simply reinforce its existing wiring.
There is a crucial caution here. Heightened neuroplasticity is bidirectional — it works both ways [20]. If the window of flexibility is used constructively, it may reinforce positive change. But if negative patterns persist or intensify during this period, they too could become more entrenched. Plasticity creates opportunity, not guarantee.
Legal and Regulatory Implications
In most countries, DMT is classified as a Schedule I substance — a category defined by the absence of accepted medical use and high potential for abuse. In the Netherlands, it falls under List I of the Opium Act (Opiumwet). If DMT-based therapies receive regulatory approval for depression or stroke, the basis for this classification weakens. A compound with demonstrated medical value, published in Nature Medicine, cannot easily be maintained in a category defined by the absence of medical value.
There is precedent. Australia rescheduled psilocybin and MDMA for supervised therapeutic use in 2023. The US FDA has granted "breakthrough therapy" designation to psilocybin for depression. If DMT follows a similar trajectory, rescheduling in European and other jurisdictions could follow — though such changes typically take years and require substantial Phase III evidence.
Reclassification of DMT would not automatically legalise ayahuasca, which contains additional controlled alkaloids and exists in a separate legal framework. Religious freedom protections for ayahuasca use exist in some jurisdictions — notably the United States (for the UDV and Santo Daime churches) and Brazil — but in most countries, no such protections apply. Nevertheless, reclassification of DMT would fundamentally alter the conversation. It is difficult to maintain that a compound is dangerous and without merit when hospitals are administering it to stroke patients.
The urgency of this question is growing. The war in Ukraine has created an estimated 6.4 million people with severe PTSD, and 10–25% of returning veterans are expected to develop serious mental health conditions. In 2025, the Ukrainian government took the remarkable step of proposing legal changes to permit research with psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA, and approved a national drug strategy that explicitly includes psychedelic-assisted therapies for trauma. Psychedelic treatment programmes for Ukrainian veterans are already operating in Spain and Ukraine itself [17]. As Europe confronts a post-war mental health crisis with limited treatment options, the case for accelerating research into DMT and ayahuasca-based therapies — which have shown early promise for PTSD [15, 16, 17] — becomes harder to dismiss.
Safety: What the Evidence Shows
The safety profile of both DMT and ayahuasca has been substantially clarified by recent research. A meta-analysis in JAMA Psychiatry found that serious adverse events occurred in 0% of healthy participants across psychedelic studies, and approximately 4% of those with pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders [21]. Psychosis incidence ranged from 0.002% in population studies to 0.6% in clinical trials — low, but not zero [22].
For ayahuasca specifically, physical effects are common but usually benign: nausea and vomiting occur in approximately 68% of users, headache in 18%, but only 2.3% required any medical attention [23]. The Phase 1 IV DMT study provides additional reassurance: cardiovascular effects were mild (10–20 mmHg blood pressure elevation) and transient, with no ECG abnormalities.
All documented ayahuasca-related fatalities have involved polydrug use or unsupervised settings. This underscores the importance of proper screening and experienced facilitation.
Important safety considerations: Both clinical programmes use pharmaceutical-grade intravenous DMT in controlled medical settings. This is not comparable to self-administration of ayahuasca or street DMT. Ayahuasca contains MAO inhibitors that create potentially dangerous interactions with common medications, including antidepressants (SSRIs, SNRIs), certain pain medications, and blood thinners. For stroke patients on anticoagulant therapy, these interactions could be life-threatening. Contraindications for ayahuasca include bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, schizophrenia spectrum conditions, and family history of psychosis. Anyone considering ayahuasca for health reasons should consult a medical professional with knowledge of both the brew and their specific health situation.
What We Do Not Yet Know
Both landmark trials are early-stage. The depression study enrolled only 34 participants and was not ethnically diverse. The stroke trial has not yet reported patient results. Large-scale controlled trials specifically on ayahuasca's effects on brain structure and function are still absent — most imaging research has used psilocybin or pure DMT rather than ayahuasca itself.
Open questions remain: whether sub-psychedelic doses deliver the same neuroprotection observed in animal models; whether the antidepressant effect depends on the subjective experience, the therapeutic support, or both; what the optimal dosing protocol looks like; whether the effects hold up in larger, more diverse populations; and whether long-term (multi-year) neuroplastic effects persist — no one has followed ayahuasca-naive participants over years with repeated brain imaging.
There is also the question of whether DMT's endogenous role in the human body — it is naturally present in brain tissue, though its function remains unclear — contributes to its tolerability or therapeutic profile. And whether the full ayahuasca brew, with its complex multi-alkaloid pharmacology, delivers benefits that isolated DMT does not. These are areas of active research with no definitive answers.
What is clear is that DMT has crossed a threshold. It is no longer a curiosity confined to ethnobotany and counterculture. It is an investigational medicine with Phase IIa data in one of the world's leading medical journals and a clinical stroke trial in preparation. Alongside it, ayahuasca research is building its own evidence base — smaller, less controlled, but pointing in the same direction.
At the same time, an estimated four million people have drunk ayahuasca at some point in their lives, the vast majority in ceremonial settings [27]. Every week, all over the world, thousands of people experience what science is now hurrying to prove. The next 12–24 months of clinical research will be decisive — but for many, the evidence has been accumulating for centuries.
References
[1] Campbell, B.C.V., et al. (2019). Ischaemic stroke. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5, 70.
[2] László, M.J., et al. (2025). N,N-dimethyltryptamine mitigates experimental stroke by stabilising the blood-brain barrier and reducing neuroinflammation. Science Advances, 11(33), eadx5958.
[3] van der Heijden, K.V., et al. (2025). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a 6-h DMT infusion in healthy volunteers. Clinical and Translational Science, 18(5), e70234.
[4] Erritzoe, D., Barba, T., et al. (2026). A short-acting psychedelic intervention for major depressive disorder: a phase IIa randomized placebo-controlled trial. Nature Medicine, 32, 591–598.
[5] Falchi-Carvalho, M., et al. (2025). Rapid and sustained antidepressant effects of vaporised DMT in treatment-resistant depression. Neuropsychopharmacology, 50, 895–903.
[6] Vargas, M.V., et al. (2023). Psychedelics promote neuroplasticity through intracellular 5-HT2A receptors. Science, 379(6633), 700–706.
[7] Moliner, R., et al. (2023). Psychedelics promote plasticity by directly binding to BDNF receptor TrkB. Nature Neuroscience, 26(6), 1032–1041.
[8] Weiss, F., et al. (2025). Psychedelic-induced neural plasticity: a comprehensive review of 70 studies. Brain Sciences, 15(2), 117.
[9] Agnorelli, C., et al. (2025). Neuroplasticity and psychedelics: a comprehensive examination. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 172, 106132.
[10] Sampedro, F., et al. (2017). Assessing the psychedelic "after-glow" in ayahuasca users. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 20(9), 698–711.
[11] Morales-García, J.A., et al. (2017). The alkaloids of Banisteriopsis caapi stimulate adult neurogenesis in vitro. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5309.
[12] Ramos, J.S., et al. (2025). Resilience and brain changes in long-term ayahuasca users. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 62(6), 1782–1790.
[13] Palhano-Fontes, F., et al. (2015). The psychedelic state induced by ayahuasca modulates the default mode network. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0118143.
[14] Benes, M., et al. (2025). What fMRI studies say about psychedelic effects: a scoping review. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 19, 1606798.
[15] Werle, I., et al. (2024). Ayahuasca-enhanced extinction of fear behaviour. British Journal of Pharmacology, 181(11), 1671–1689.
[16] ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT07317206: Ayahuasca, Esketamine and PTSD. University of São Paulo.
[17] Calnan, M., et al. (2025). Therapeutic effects of psychedelics in military veterans. Brain and Behavior, 15(7), e70660.
[18] Andión, Ó., et al. (2025). A new insight into ayahuasca's adverse effects and context-dependent outcomes. PLOS Mental Health, 2(4), e0000097.
[19] Jiang, Q., et al. (2025). Psilocybin triggers activity-dependent rewiring of cortical networks. Cell.
[20] Cramer, S.C., et al. (2011). Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 134(6), 1591–1609.
[21] Hinkle, J.T., et al. (2024). Adverse events in studies of classic psychedelics. JAMA Psychiatry, 81(12), 1225–1235.
[22] Sabe, M., et al. (2024). Reconsidering evidence for psychedelic-induced psychosis. Molecular Psychiatry.
[23] White, E., et al. (2024). Ayahuasca and DMT adverse events and toxicity analysis. International Journal of Toxicology, 43(3), 327–339.
[24] Becker, W., et al. (2011). β-Carboline compounds, including harmine, inhibit DYRK1A and tau phosphorylation at multiple Alzheimer's disease-related sites. PLOS ONE, 6(5), e19264.
[25] Gohari, S.T., et al. (2023). Psychoplastogenic DYRK1A inhibitors with therapeutic effects relevant to Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 66(23), 16123–16141.
[26] Palhano-Fontes, F., et al. (2019). Rapid antidepressant effects of the psychedelic ayahuasca in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 49(4), 655–663.
[27] ICEERS (2024). Four million people have taken ayahuasca worldwide. International Center for Ethnobotanical Education, Research & Service.
Notes
† As of March 2026, no public confirmation of first patient dosing in the Algernon NeuroScience Phase 2a stroke trial has appeared. The trial's progress may depend on the company's ongoing financing efforts.
Editorial direction and domain expertise on the ayahuasca realm, set, setting & ceremonial context: Rini Hartman. Research synthesis and co-production: Claude Cowork. Cross-source synthesis: NotebookLM. Scientific verification: Elicit. Fact-checking: ChatGPT Deep Research & Gemini Deep Research.